In an argumentative essay, what makes a warrant strong?

• A. It states the claim more boldly.
• B. Cites more sources than needed.
• C. It uses rhetorical questions.
• D. It logically connects evidence to the claim and addresses counterarguments.

Answer: (D)

The strength of a warrant lies in how it connects evidence to the claim, showing why the evidence matters and what general principle or assumption makes that connection valid. A strong warrant makes that bridge explicit and clear, explaining why the data actually supports the claim and how it fits with broader ideas or accepted beliefs. It also anticipates counterarguments, showing how the evidence still applies even when objections are raised. For example, if you argue that a city should invest in public transit because it reduces congestion, a strong warrant would explain the underlying principle that shifting transportation from cars to buses lowers traffic volume, while also acknowledging other factors that could influence congestion and clarifying why the evidence still supports the investment. Simply making the claim more forceful, citing many sources, or using rhetorical questions doesn’t by itself prove that the evidence is relevant or that the link is sound.